Fish legal v information commissioner

Author: ahqe

August undefined, 2024

WebJun 24, 2015 · In some instances it is upon how exceptions to access operate (C-71/10 Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2011] ECR I-7205), in other cases it is about the public institutions a regime covers (Fish Legal v Information Commissioner [2015] UKUT 52 (AAC)), or the ‘information’ it applies to (The Independent … WebInformation Disseminated by Federal Agencies; Republication, 67 Fed. Reg. 8452, (February 22, 2002). g. All information disseminated for which VA can reasonably …

Right to Know CLG and Raheenleagh Power DAC - The Office …

WebFeb 12, 2024 · The Information Commissioner’s Office upheld Fish Legal’s subsequent complaint, a decision that E.ON UK Plc then appealed in the courts unsuccessfully. The decision extends the scope of information law beyond the 2015 landmark case won by Fish Legal in which the Upper Tribunal ruled that water and sewage companies in … WebFeb 26, 2024 · The Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) has published a decision notice finding E.ON UK plc (“E.ON”)[1] a public authority for the purposes of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (“EIR”). ... Fish Legal v Information Commissioner & Others (GIA/0979/2011 & GIA/0980/2011) [4] Paragraph 29 of the … high court writ petition

EUR-Lex - 62012CJ0279 - EN - EUR-Lex

WebFreshwater Fishing Regulations. General Freshwater Fishing Regulations. Fishing in inland waters must be by angling with a hook and line or rod and reel. (See exceptions for … WebApr 13, 2015 · The UK’s Upper Tribunal (“UT“) has ruled in Fish Legal v Information Commission and others that privatised water utility companies in England and Wales are considered to be “public ... WebJul 3, 2024 · The core of the argument on appeal was whether or not – having regard to Cross v Information Commissioner & Cabinet Office [2016] UKUT 153 (AAC) – there was a cumulative requirement both of special powers and that they had been entrusted by legislation, having regard to para 52 of the CJEU’s judgment in Fish Legal: “which are … high court working days

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Environmental …

Open the Floodgates! Water Companies Subject to EIR

WebMar 12, 2014 · Fish Legal (and another) v The Information Commissioner, United Utilities, Yorkshire Water and Southern Water - Case C-279/12 Judgment of European … WebNov 28, 2016 · In his decision in the NAMA case, O'Donnell J. applied the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Fish Legal and Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner and Others (C-279/12), which considers the meaning of "public authority" under Articles 2(2)(a), (b) and (c) of Directive 2003/4 (replicated as paragraphs … high court yabaWebIt added that the CJEU judgment in Case C-279/12 (Fish Legal & Emily Shirley v. Information Commissioner, United Utilities Water Plc, Yorkshire Water and Services Ltd and Southern Water Services Ltd) (Fish Legal) is not determinative in this case. It said that, in that case, the CJEU did not consider the status of a subsidiary, joint venture or ... high court zambia location

"WebAug 31, 2024 · There was not an equivalent provision to section 6 of the Water Industry Act 1991, which was considered by the Upper Tribunal in Fish Legal v Information Commissioner [2014] UKUT 52, where a group ... " - Fish legal v information commissioner

Fish legal v information commissioner

Tribunal advocates generous meaning of “public authority” within …

WebList of documents. Search result: 1 case (s) 1 documents analysed. 1/1. C-279/12 - Fish Legal and Shirley. [Case closed] Main proceedings. Judgment of the Court (Grand … WebMay 28, 2024 · The Information Commissioner; 2. Fish Legal (GIA): [2024] UKUT 132 (AAC) Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus QC …

Did you know?

WebJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 19 December 2013.#Fish Legal and Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — … Web[2016] AACR 39 (Cross v IC) 4 a directions hearing on 2 June 2014, it was re-introduced until after the UT’s own judgment in Fish Legal on whether the water companies were public authorities for the purposes of the EIR. The UT’s judgment was promulgated on 16 February 2015 and is reported as Fish Legal and Shirley v Information Commissioner and ors …

WebFish Legal v Information Commissioner, United Utilities Water Plc and Yorkshire Water Services Ltd. In February 2015, Fish Legal won a 6 year legal battle to force privatised water and sewerage companies in … Weband management of the Department, including legal matters concerning the Department. 38 U.S.C. § 303. Further, the Secretary has designated the Department’s General Counsel …

Web5 Case C-279/12: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2013, in Fish Legal and Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner and Others. ... 6 Fish Legal v Information Commissioner, United Utilities, Yorkshire Water Services and DEFRA [2015] UKUT 0052 (AAC). WebWelcome to Virginia Assessors! Virginia Assessors is your doorway to all Virginia County websites for on-line Parcel, Tax & GIS Data. Search parcel data, tax digest & GIS maps …

WebFeb 25, 2015 · This outcome was then revisited in Fish Legal v Information Commissioner [2012] UKUT 177 (ACC), brought by the legal arm of the Angling Trust which is concerned about water quality in relation to ...

WebCase C-279/12: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal — United Kingdom) — Fish Legal, Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner, United Utilities Water plc, Yorkshire Water Services Ltd, Southern Water Services Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aarhus … high court writeWeb13. The Commissioner considers the scope of this case is whether E.ON UK plc is a public authority for the purposes of the EIR. 14. In the case of Fish Legal v Information … high court writ appeal formatWebDec 19, 2013 · 18 Fish Legal and Mrs Shirley then appealed against those decisions to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chambers, Information Rights), which stayed the … how fast can i click the mouseWeb9. The Commissioner considers the scope of this case to be concerned with the question of whether HAL is a public authority for the purposes of the FOIA/EIR. 10. In the recent case of Fish Legal v Information Commissioner & Others (GIA/0979/2011 & GIA/0980/2011) (“Fish Legal”), the Upper Tribunal highcoutry.netWebInformation Commissioner. Fish Legal v. Information Commissioner, Case C‑279/12 (December 19, 2013) ECLI:EU:C:2013:853. Court of Justice for the European Union. A … how fast can humans travel in spaceWeb(GIA/0979/2011 & GIA/0980/2011) (“Fish Legal”), the Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber (the “UT”) ruled that the Commissioner has jurisdiction to both … high cove ltdWebOct 20, 2016 · In Fish Legal and Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner and Others (C-279/12) (Fish Legal) the Court of Justice of the European Union considered the meaning of “public authority” under article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2003/4 (equivalent to paragraph (c) of the definition of "public authority" contained in the AIE Regulations). The Court set ... high court writ fees